




































12 
 

THE DIGNITY OF LIFE IN THE LIGHT OF ALBERT SCHWEITZER’S 

PHILOSOPHY OF REVERENCE FOR LIFE 

 

Okewu Michael Peter 

Claretian University of Nigeria, Nekede, Owerri 

okewupeteryahoo.com, okewu.michaelpeter@claretianuniversity.edu.ng 

 

ABSTRACT 

Albert Schweitzer’s philosophy of Reverence for Life presents a profound ethical ground centered 

on the dignity of all living beings. This principle, rooted in a deep sense of responsibility toward 

life, challenges anthropocentric worldviews and calls for an inclusive moral consideration of all 

forms of existence. Schweitzer’s ethical thought emerges from his conviction that life, in all its 

manifestations, possesses intrinsic value and deserves respect. His philosophy rejects utilitarian 

and purely rationalist approaches to ethics, advocating instead for an intuitive and compassionate 

engagement with the world. This paper employs Schweitzer’s Reverence for Life as a foundational 

concept for understanding human dignity within a broader ecological and ethical context. It 

examines how his philosophy extends the notion of dignity beyond human beings to encompass 

all living creatures, arguing for a universal ethic of care and responsibility. Furthermore, the study 

highlights Schweitzer’s critique of modern civilization’s disregard for life’s sanctity and the 

implications of his thought for contemporary discussions on bioethics, environmental ethics, and 

human rights. Emphasizing the interconnectedness of all life forms, Schweitzer’s philosophy 

challenges us to redefine ethical relationships in a way that fosters greater harmony and respect 

for life’s intrinsic worth. This paper thus contributes to the ongoing discourse on dignity by 

positioning Reverence for Life as a vital ethical principle that remains relevant in addressing 

contemporary moral and ecological challenges. 

Keywords: Bioethics, Dignity of life, Environmental Ethics, Intrinsic value, Reverence for Life, 

Universal Responsibility. 

 

INTRODUCTION 

Albert Schweitzer's philosophy of Reverence for Life is an ethical thought that places the sanctity 

of all life—human, animal, and environmental—at the center of moral consideration. Developed 

during the early twentieth century, Schweitzer’s ideas challenge the mechanistic worldview and 

anthropocentrism that characterized much of modern thought, particularly in the realms of 

industrialization, scientific progress, and technological advancement. His ethical stance advocates 

for a moral responsibility toward all living beings, emphasizing compassion, respect, and a 

commitment to alleviate suffering wherever it exists (Schweitzer, 1923). 

In the Philosophy of Civilization, Schweitzer contended that the rise of technology had fostered an 

attitude of domination over nature and other living beings, rather than a respectful coexistence 

with them. He argued that scientific and technological progress, while improving human material 

conditions, had simultaneously led to a reductionist, utilitarian view of life—one that disregarded 

the inherent value and sanctity of existence itself (Schweitzer, 1923). Schweitzer believed that this 

dehumanizing worldview threatened the very core of ethical living, as it overlooked the moral 

importance of compassion, empathy, and respect for life. 



                                                                                   Aquino Journal of Philosophy, Vol 5 Issue 1, April 2025. 

                 ISSN: 2786-9792 

 

                                                                                   

13 
 

The principle of Reverence for Life encourages humans to recognize the intrinsic value of all life 

forms, urging a universal respect for their existence and well-being (Schweitzer, 1954). In this 

sense, Schweitzer's philosophy is both a critique of modernity's instrumental approach to nature 

and a call for a more compassionate and holistic view of the world. This ethical stance, grounded 

in a deep spiritual and moral commitment, is as relevant today as it was when Schweitzer first 

articulated it, particularly in light of the contemporary environmental crisis, technological 

advancements, and ongoing social injustices. 

The purpose of this paper is to explore the key elements of Schweitzer’s philosophy and its 

contemporary relevance. In particular, the paper will examine how Schweitzer’s Reverence for 

Life informs current ethical discussions surrounding environmentalism, animal rights, bioethics, 

and global humanitarian efforts. By revisiting Schweitzer's work, we can gain valuable insights 

into how his principles can guide modern ethical practices and address pressing global challenges. 

As we confront the moral dilemmas of the twenty-first century, Schweitzer's philosophy remains 

a powerful tool for fostering a more compassionate, responsible, and sustainable world. 

 

SCHWEITZER’S CONCEPT OF REVERENCE FOR LIFE 

Albert Schweitzer’s central ethical principle, Reverence for Life, is a comprehensive moral 

philosophy that emphasizes the inherent dignity of all living beings. At its core, this concept asserts 

that life itself has intrinsic value, and it is our moral duty to treat all forms of life—human, animal, 

plant, or even microscopic—with respect and compassion. Schweitzer’s Reverence for Life is not 

simply a philosophical abstraction but a practical and transformative approach to ethics, calling 

for a radical shift in how humans relate to the world around them. 

In other words, the central tenet of Schweitzer’s ethical philosophy is the concept of Reverence 

for Life. This idea asserts that all life has intrinsic value and deserves respect, regardless of its 

form or function. Schweitzer was inspired by the ethical teachings of various religious and 

philosophical traditions, particularly those that advocated for compassion and a deep spiritual 

connection with all living beings. For example, his exposure to Eastern religions, particularly 

Hinduism and Buddhism, influenced his understanding of life’s sanctity. Both traditions 

emphasize nonviolence and the interconnectedness of all living beings (Schweitzer, 1954). 

Defining Reverence for Life 

Reverence for Life is grounded in the belief that all living beings possess an inherent worth simply 

by virtue of their existence. Schweitzer argued that this reverence is not limited to human beings 

but extends to all forms of life, regardless of their complexity, intelligence, or usefulness to 

humanity. To "reverence" life is to acknowledge its sacredness and to honor its inherent dignity, 

which necessitates that we refrain from causing harm whenever possible and act with compassion 

toward all living creatures. 

Reverence for Life is more than just a moral guideline; it is an existential stance that acknowledges 

the sanctity of life in its most basic form. Schweitzer defines reverence as "the ethical attitude 



                                            
           Okewu Michael Peter                                                               The Dignity of Life in Light of Albert….. 

 

 

14 
 

toward life" which requires that individuals "respect the dignity and worth of all living things" 

(Schweitzer, 1954). This respect is not limited to human beings but extends to animals, plants, and 

even microorganisms. According to Schweitzer, all life forms possess an inherent value and must 

be treated with dignity, as each living being is capable of experiencing pain and joy (Schweitzer, 

1923). 

Life as the Central Ethical Consideration in Schweitzer’s Philosophy  

The central tenet of Reverence for Life is that life itself is sacred and must be respected. 

Schweitzer’s philosophy asserts that life, in all its diversity, should be at the center of ethical 

consideration. Unlike many traditional ethical systems that place human beings at the top of the 

moral hierarchy (anthropocentrism), Schweitzer’s approach is fundamentally biocentric. He 

argues that moral consideration should be extended beyond humanity to include all forms of life, 

from animals and plants to the smallest microorganisms. This ethical extension implies that all 

living things, simply by virtue of their existence, have a claim to respect and protection. 

Schweitzer believed that human beings have a special moral responsibility to recognize the value 

of life. However, this responsibility is not based on human superiority, but rather on human 

capacity for compassion and moral agency. Human beings, with their advanced cognitive abilities, 

have the power to either nurture life or to harm it. Therefore, they bear a special responsibility to 

act as stewards and caretakers of life on Earth. 

 

THE ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS OF REVERENCE FOR LIFE 

The principle of Reverence for Life has profound ethical implications, both in personal and societal 

contexts. Schweitzer argued that the ethical life is one that is actively committed to the alleviation 

of suffering and the promotion of life in all its forms. This commitment is not merely a passive 

acknowledgment of life’s value but an active, moral stance that requires individuals to engage with 

the world in a way that reduces harm and promotes well-being. 

Compassion and Altruism  

Reverence for Life calls for an altruistic and compassionate approach to others, where individuals 

recognize their duty to alleviate suffering, regardless of the species or form of life involved. 

Schweitzer’s concept extends beyond human relationships to include animals and the environment. 

His philosophy insists that suffering is a universal experience and, as such, should not be inflicted 

upon any living being unnecessarily. This calls for a rethinking of practices like factory farming, 

animal experimentation, and environmental destruction, all of which involve the exploitation and 

suffering of non-human life (Schweitzer, 1954). 

Moral Responsibility to Non-Human Life  

Schweitzer’s ethics challenge humans to broaden their moral considerations beyond the confines 

of human society. In a world that often views animals and nature through a utilitarian lens, 

Schweitzer insists that all life—whether human or non-human—deserves respect and protection. 



                                                                                   Aquino Journal of Philosophy, Vol 5 Issue 1, April 2025. 

                 ISSN: 2786-9792 

 

                                                                                   

15 
 

His views have been highly influential in the development of modern animal rights ethics and 

environmentalism. By stressing the intrinsic value of animals and the natural world, Schweitzer 

laid the groundwork for contemporary ethical debates concerning the moral treatment of animals, 

environmental conservation, and the reduction of human impact on the earth (Van der Gucht, 

2007). 

SCHWEITZER’S CRITIQUE OF MODERNITY AND TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS 

Albert Schweitzer’s philosophical reflections on modernity and technological progress are integral 

to his broader ethical framework of Reverence for Life. Schweitzer viewed the advances of modern 

civilization—particularly in the realms of science, technology, and industrialization—as having 

both positive and negative consequences for humanity and the world. While acknowledging the 

practical benefits of technological progress, he was deeply concerned about its dehumanizing 

effects, its potential to disconnect people from the sacredness of life, and its role in exploiting 

nature and non-human animals. His critique is rooted in a profound sense of the spiritual and moral 

implications of technological advancement, which he believed often led to an erosion of ethical 

responsibility toward life itself. 

Schweitzer's concept of Reverence for Life can be understood as a direct response to the challenges 

of modernity, particularly the increasing mechanization and commodification of life. The rise of 

industrialism, technological advancement, and the growing influence of utilitarian ethics all 

contributed to a worldview that often neglected the intrinsic value of life in favor of efficiency and 

material gain. Schweitzer's philosophy was a critique of this reductionist view, calling for a more 

holistic and compassionate approach to life and human progress. 

His emphasis on the dignity of all life and the ethical obligation to protect it challenges modern 

practices that prioritize human interests over the welfare of other living beings. Schweitzer’s 

critique of modernity also serves as a warning against the dangers of technological and scientific 

progress when it is divorced from ethical consideration. His philosophy reminds us that human 

advancement must be accompanied by moral reflection and a commitment to alleviating suffering, 

not just for humans, but for all living creatures (Schweitzer, 1923). 

Reverence for Life is a deeply ethical and spiritual principle that calls for a profound respect for 

all living beings and an active commitment to the alleviation of suffering. Schweitzer’s concept 

challenges modern societies to rethink their relationship with nature, animals, and each other, 

urging humanity to embrace a more compassionate and responsible way of living. As we face the 

ethical dilemmas of the twenty-first century, Schweitzer’s philosophy remains an enduring guide, 

advocating for an ethic of interconnectedness, compassion, and moral responsibility toward all 

life. 

 The Mechanization of Human Existence 

One of Schweitzer's most significant critiques of modernity is the mechanization of human 

existence. As Western civilization moved toward industrialization and technological progress, 

Schweitzer believed that humanity began to view life, including human life, through a mechanistic 

lens. He argued that the rise of science and technology led to a reductionist worldview, where 



                                            
           Okewu Michael Peter                                                               The Dignity of Life in Light of Albert….. 

 

 

16 
 

living beings, including humans, were seen more as machines or objects rather than as beings with 

inherent dignity and a spiritual essence. 

Schweitzer’s concern was that this mechanistic worldview led to the devaluation of life. When 

humans began to focus primarily on the efficiency and functionality of their surroundings, they 

lost sight of the intrinsic value of living beings. This worldview promoted a utilitarian approach to 

life, where beings were valued only for their utility to human ends. In turn, this fostered a culture  

that justified exploitation, both of people and the environment, in the name of progress and 

productivity. 

For Schweitzer, this mechanization of life was morally dangerous because it separated individuals 

from a sense of ethical responsibility toward the natural world. Without reverence for life, 

technological advancements became tools for domination and exploitation rather than for 

promoting human flourishing or nurturing the well-being of all living creatures. 

Technological Progress and Its Ethical Consequences 

While Schweitzer acknowledged the immense practical benefits of technological progress, such as 

improved health care, communication, and comfort, he also raised serious ethical concerns about 

its unchecked development. In his work The Philosophy of Civilization, Schweitzer warned that 

modern technological achievements often led to moral corruption, as they were employed to serve 

human desires without adequate consideration for their broader consequences on life, both human 

and non-human. 

Schweitzer believed that the overreliance on technology led to a form of alienation. As humans 

became more dependent on machines and technological systems, they increasingly lost touch with 

the spiritual and moral aspects of life. Instead of fostering genuine human relationships, 

technological progress often resulted in an increase in human isolation and a diminished sense of 

personal responsibility. The technological world, in Schweitzer’s view, created an environment 

where people were seen as mere cogs in a machine, contributing to a larger system, but not as 

individuals with a moral duty to others and the world. 

Technological progress, in Schweitzer’s view, often prioritized human convenience and economic 

growth over the preservation of life in all its forms. This disregard for the sanctity of life was 

compounded by the rise of mechanized warfare, which showed how technology could be wielded 

to destroy rather than preserve life. The use of atomic bombs during World War II, which 

Schweitzer strongly condemned, exemplified the destructive potential of technological 

advancements when divorced from ethical consideration. 

 The Loss of Spiritual and Ethical Awareness 

Schweitzer argued that modern civilization, in its blind pursuit of technological progress, had lost 

touch with the deeper spiritual and ethical dimensions of existence. The emphasis on materialism, 

efficiency, and economic growth left little room for consideration of the spiritual or moral 

consequences of human actions. Schweitzer believed that technological advancements had 



                                                                                   Aquino Journal of Philosophy, Vol 5 Issue 1, April 2025. 

                 ISSN: 2786-9792 

 

                                                                                   

17 
 

contributed to a world where people no longer recognized the sacredness of life. Instead, they saw 

nature and other living beings as objects to be controlled, used, and exploited for human benefit. 

Schweitzer’s critique was not just about the dangers of technology itself, but about the loss of a 

moral and spiritual orientation in the face of rapid industrialization. He believed that true progress 

lay in a more ethical relationship to life, one that involved recognizing the dignity and sanctity of 

all living beings, not just human beings. This was a call for a humanism that was spiritually 

grounded and ethically responsible. Schweitzer believed that modernity’s focus on technological 

progress and material success had diminished the capacity for compassion, reverence, and 

responsibility—the very qualities that were central to his ethical system. 

Schweitzer’s critique extended to the need for a moral reawakening in modern society. He called 

for a shift in values, where technological progress would be seen as a means to support human 

well-being in a way that respects the dignity of all life. Rather than being driven by the pursuit of 

power, profit, and domination, human progress should focus on fostering compassion, 

responsibility, and respect for life. This ethical reorientation would require individuals to recognize 

that true progress is not measured by the accumulation of wealth or power, but by the extent to 

which humanity fosters the flourishing of all living beings. 

The Mechanization of Life and the Loss of Moral Sensibility 

Schweitzer was acutely aware of the mechanization of society that accompanied technological and 

industrial advancements. He argued that modernity’s focus on efficiency, productivity, and 

material progress led to the objectification and commodification of life. In The Philosophy of 

Civilization, Schweitzer critiques the reductionist attitude that arose from mechanistic thinking, 

which sought to understand and control nature and human beings as if they were mere machines. 

He writes, “The mechanistic view of life leads us to treat the world as if it were an aggregate of 

things to be used for human purposes” (Schweitzer, 1923). This perspective, he argues, disregards 

the inherent value of living beings and reduces them to resources to be exploited. 

Schweitzer’s critique of the mechanistic worldview was informed by his understanding of life as 

something deeply spiritual and interconnected. The mechanization of life, he contended, resulted 

in a loss of moral sensitivity to the suffering of other beings. As technology advanced, people 

became increasingly disconnected from the natural world and from the ethical considerations 

necessary for truly understanding and respecting life. Schweitzer’s philosophy, which emphasizes 

Reverence for Life, directly challenges this reductionist worldview, urging a return to an ethic that 

recognizes the intrinsic value of all living beings, not just as objects to be controlled or exploited 

(Schweitzer, 1954). 

 The Dehumanizing Effect of Technological Progress 

Schweitzer was also concerned with the dehumanizing impact of technological progress, 

particularly in its potential to erode human empathy and compassion. While technology brought 

material benefits, it also contributed to a culture of alienation, where human beings were 

increasingly seen as parts of a vast, impersonal system. Schweitzer writes, “The triumph of 

technology has led man to believe that he can dominate the world, yet it has stripped him of his 



                                            
           Okewu Michael Peter                                                               The Dignity of Life in Light of Albert….. 

 

 

18 
 

spiritual connection to the world and to other people” (Schweitzer, 1923). For Schweitzer, 

technological advancements, while improving material conditions, often undermined the moral 

and spiritual foundations necessary for a fulfilling and meaningful life. 

This dehumanizing effect is particularly evident in industrial practices that prioritize efficiency 

over human welfare, such as the exploitation of workers and the prioritization of profit over ethical 

considerations. Schweitzer’s work emphasizes that technological progress must not come at the 

cost of human dignity, suggesting that society must balance technological innovation with moral 

reflection and spiritual insight. His criticism of modernity calls for a reevaluation of how 

technology is used, ensuring that it serves to enhance rather than diminish human well-being (Van 

der Gucht, 2007). 

   THE CONTEMPORARY RELEVANCE OF ALBERT SCHWEITZER'S PHILOSOPHY 

Albert Schweitzer’s philosophy, particularly his concept of Reverence for Life, has profound 

contemporary relevance in various fields, from environmental ethics to bioethics, animal rights, 

and social justice. In today’s world, characterized by rapid technological advancement, 

environmental crises, and social inequalities, Schweitzer’s ethical framework offers vital insights 

for addressing the moral challenges we face. 

Environmental Ethics and Sustainability 

Schweitzer’s philosophy is increasingly relevant in the context of modern environmental concerns. 

As the world grapples with issues such as climate change, deforestation, biodiversity loss, and 

pollution, Schweitzer’s Reverence for Life provides a compelling ethical foundation for 

advocating sustainable environmental practices. His view that all life, not just human life, has 

intrinsic value, calls for a radical shift in how we approach environmental conservation. This is 

especially relevant today as human activity continues to degrade ecosystems and disrupt the 

balance of life on Earth. Schweitzer’s vision of a life-affirming and interconnected world 

challenges current industrial practices that exploit nature for short-term gain at the expense of long-

term environmental health (Van der Gucht, 2007). 

The rise of environmental movements in the 21st century, including campaigns for biodiversity 

preservation, climate action, and sustainable development, echoes Schweitzer’s call for humanity 

to view itself as stewards of the earth, responsible for the well-being of all life forms. His emphasis 

on compassion and interconnectedness resonates with the growing recognition that environmental 

sustainability is not only a scientific or political issue but also a moral one (Hiltner, 2014). 

 Bioethics and Medical Ethics 

In the field of bioethics, Schweitzer’s humanitarian work and his ethical perspective on life have 

significant contemporary relevance. His emphasis on compassion, dignity, and respect for human 

life informs modern debates on issues such as euthanasia, organ donation, and end-of-life care. 

Schweitzer’s philosophy insists that all life, regardless of circumstances, has inherent worth and 

should be treated with reverence. This is particularly relevant in discussions about medical ethics, 



                                                                                   Aquino Journal of Philosophy, Vol 5 Issue 1, April 2025. 

                 ISSN: 2786-9792 

 

                                                                                   

19 
 

where decisions often involve questions about the value of life in situations of terminal illness or 

significant disability (Christian, 2003). 

Schweitzer’s approach to bioethics prioritizes a holistic view of the patient, advocating for care 

that attends to the emotional, spiritual, and social dimensions of illness, in addition to the physical. 

In an era when healthcare systems are often characterized by impersonal, mechanized practices, 

Schweitzer’s emphasis on a compassionate, patient-centered approach is more important than ever. 

His work underscores the need for healthcare providers to maintain empathy and respect for 

patients, ensuring that medical decisions are not driven solely by efficiency but by a commitment 

to human dignity (Fiedler, 2018). 

 

Global Social Justice and Human Rights 

Schweitzer’s humanitarian philosophy has continuing relevance in the context of global social 

justice. His efforts to provide medical care and support to marginalized populations in Africa 

illustrate his deep commitment to the dignity and worth of every human being, regardless of race, 

nationality, or social standing. In an increasingly globalized world, Schweitzer’s work highlights 

the moral imperative to address global inequalities, from access to healthcare to education, food 

security, and basic human rights (Schweitzer, 1923). 

In contemporary debates surrounding immigration, refugees, and economic disparities between 

nations, Schweitzer’s call for the recognition of shared humanity offers a moral foundation for 

efforts to alleviate suffering and promote justice. His philosophy encourages individuals and 

governments to address the root causes of poverty and inequality, not merely the symptoms, and 

to consider the long-term implications of policies on the well-being of vulnerable populations (Van 

der Gucht, 2007). 

Technological and Ethical Challenges 

As technological advancements, particularly in fields like artificial intelligence, genetic 

engineering, and biotechnology, continue to raise profound ethical questions, Schweitzer’s 

philosophy offers crucial guidance for navigating these challenges. His critique of the 

mechanization of life and the dehumanizing effects of unchecked technological progress remains 

highly pertinent today. Schweitzer warned against the dangers of viewing technological 

advancements as ends in themselves, emphasizing that such progress must always be tempered by 

ethical considerations that recognize the sanctity and interconnectedness of life (Schweitzer, 

1923). 

In the context of debates about genetic modification, artificial intelligence, and other emerging 

technologies, Schweitzer’s concept of Reverence for Life challenges humanity to ensure that 

technology is used to serve life rather than to diminish or control it. His call for ethical reflection 

in the face of rapid technological progress encourages a future where technology enhances human 

flourishing and respects the inherent dignity of all life forms (Kegley & Wrenn, 2002). 

 



                                            
           Okewu Michael Peter                                                               The Dignity of Life in Light of Albert….. 

 

 

20 
 

CONCLUSION 

Albert Schweitzer’s philosophy of Reverence for Life continues to offer valuable ethical guidance 

in addressing some of the most pressing challenges of contemporary society. His deep respect for 

all forms of life, commitment to compassion, and insistence on ethical responsibility provide a 

moral framework that can inform debates about environmental protection, animal rights, bioethics, 

and social justice. As modernity continues to evolve, Schweitzer’s call for a more ethical, 

compassionate, and responsible relationship with the world and its inhabitants remains a vital and 

necessary guiding principle. In an age of technological advancement, global interconnectedness, 

and environmental crisis, Reverence for Life offers a pathway to a more sustainable, 

compassionate, and just future for all living beings. 

In an era marked by ecological crises, technological advancements, and deepening social 

inequalities, Schweitzer’s emphasis on the interconnectedness of all life and the moral imperative 

to treat all living beings with dignity provides crucial guidance. His philosophy challenges us to 

rethink our approach to technology, the environment, and human relationships, urging a future that 

prioritizes compassion, sustainability, and ethical reflection. As the world continues to face 

complex moral questions, Schweitzer’s vision of a life-affirming ethical framework offers a timely 

and necessary contribution to contemporary philosophical discourse 

Moreover, Schweitzer’s critique of modernity and technological progress reminds us of the 

dangers inherent in the mechanization of life, where efficiency and profit often overshadow moral 

and spiritual considerations. His work calls for a reevaluation of how technological developments 

and economic systems are employed and urges us to integrate ethical responsibility into the very 

fabric of our progress. In contemporary bioethics, environmentalism, and global humanitarian 

work, Schweitzer's philosophy offers a compelling call to center the value of life in all its forms, 

ensuring that human advancements serve the greater good of the planet and its inhabitants. 

Schweitzer continues to call us back, reminding us that true progress is not measured by material 

wealth or technological capability, but by our ability to foster a world where all living beings are 

treated with dignity and respect. As we confront the challenges of the modern world, Schweitzer’s 

commitment to Reverence for Life provides a moral compass that can guide us toward a more 

compassionate, sustainable, and just future. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



                                                                                   Aquino Journal of Philosophy, Vol 5 Issue 1, April 2025. 

                 ISSN: 2786-9792 

 

                                                                                   

21 
 

REFERENCES 

Christian, W. (2003). Albert Schweitzer: A Biography. USA: HarperCollins Publishers. 

Fiedler, M. (2018). The Ethics of Reverence for Life and the Future of Humanity. UK: Springer. 

Hiltner, S. (2014).  ‘Reverence for Life: The Ethics of Albert Schweitzer.’ Journal of Religious 

Ethics, 42(1), 103–128. 

Kegley, C. W., & Wrenn, C. (2002). Ethics and Technology: Ethical Issues in an Age of 

Technology. USA: Wadsworth Publishing. 

Schweitzer, A. (1906). The Quest of the Historical Jesus. New York: Macmillan. 

Schweitzer, A. (1923). The Philosophy of Civilization. Translated by C. T. Campion.  New York: 

Macmillan. 

Schweitzer, A. (1954). Reverence for Life. Translated by C. T. Campion.  New York: Macmillan. 

Van der Gucht, C. (2007). Albert Schweitzer: A Biography. USA:  Princeton University Press. 

 


